Analisis Wacana Free West Papua Campaign pada Operasi Militer Indonesia dalam Konflik Nduga: Sebuah Tinjauan Kritis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21776/jtg.v7i1.153Abstract
Mainstream narratives on Indonesia's military operation in West Papua describe it to help the conflicting region achieve peace and prosperity. This hegemonic and widely held public opinion is more often used to justify the behavior of the Indonesian Government in West Papua. This research aims to offer an alternative perspective on the matter by looking at the narrative promoted and written by Free West Papua Campaign (FWPC) on their news reports about the Nduga Conflict in 2018-2019 from their website: freewestpapua.org. Norman Fairclough's critical discourse analysis examines the discourse created from the news coverage within the three-dimensional analysis, namely the textual, the discourse practices, and sociocultural dimensions. Results show that FWPC depicts Indonesia's military as exploiters of the indigenous Papuans. At the same time, FWPC also tries to build a sense of belonging to gain support from the international society and online activists.References
Bartholomew, A., & Mayer, M. (1992). Nomads of the Present: Melucci's Contribution to `New Social Movement' Theory. Theory, Culture & Society, 9(4), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327692009004007
BBC News. (2018). Jokowi tentang pelaku pembunuhan buruh proyek Papua: “Tumpas sampai ke akar-akarnya.†Retrieved September 9, 2020, from BBC News website: https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-46450499
Cunningham, K. G. (2018). The Efficacy of Nonviolence in Self-determination Disputes. 1–43.
Eriyanto. (2009). Analisis Wacana : Pengantar Analisa Teks Media. Yogyakarta: LKiS.
Eriyanto. (2011). Analisis Wacana : Pengantar Analisis Teks Media. Yogyakarta: LKiS.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. New York: Longman Group.
Faisal, M. (2007). Dari Anarchic Cyber Space menjadi Transnational Public Sphere. Membaca Relasi antara Cyber¬ space fan Civil Society di Era Postmodern (Studi kasus: Greenpeace Online Activist). Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.7454/global.v9i2.264
Habermas, J., & Rehg, W. (2001). Constitutional Democracy: A Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles? Political Theory, 29(6), 766–781. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591701029006002
Ks, U. (2009). Ekonomi Media : Pengantar Konsep dan Aplikasi. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Nurhadi, S. (2016). Pemerintah Tak Jelaskan Pemblokiran Situs ’Suara Papua. Retrieved May 10, 2020, from VOA Indonesia website: https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/pemerintah-blokir-suara-papua/3641759
Rismawati, N., & Siahaan, C. (2014). Kebebasan Pers dalam Perspektif Jurnalis di Daerah Konflik ( Studi Kasus Pembatasan Akses Jurnalis Asing di Papua. In Membayangkan Indonesia Baru (pp. 141–148). Yogyakarta: Program Studi Ilmu komunikasi UII.
Sassen, S. (2004). Local Actors in Global Politics. Current Sociology, 52(4), 649–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392104043495
Sydney, T. (1989). Democracy and Disorder. London: Oxford University Press.
Wilson, J. (2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 215–240. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.215
